33
          
        
        
          
            d
          
        
        
          
            &
          
        
        
          
            ri
          
        
        
          MAY-JUNE 2015
        
        
          AGGREGATE
        
        
          WASHING
        
        
          produced.”
        
        
          “In theUKby contrast, it is joinedup
        
        
          very intelligently, in fairness. TheAggregates
        
        
          Levy is creating funds that arebeingput
        
        
          into recycling, there are schemes such as
        
        
          Aggregain andWRAP that arewell funded
        
        
          andwell set up that provide information and
        
        
          research findings, andmany government
        
        
          contracts in theUK require theuseof 20%
        
        
          recycledmaterial. The result is amarket and a
        
        
          demand for thismaterial.”
        
        
          Hewent to say that local virginmaterial
        
        
          cost has amajor impact on the acceptance of
        
        
          recycled aggregate– if it is high, therewill be
        
        
          ademand for recycledbut if it is low, there
        
        
          will be littleor nodemand.
        
        
          Perhaps theUK aggregates recyclingmodel
        
        
          is one that other countries could emulate, in
        
        
          thatwhile often anational governmentmight
        
        
          wish for increaseduseof recycledmaterial in
        
        
          new constructionprojects, theremight not
        
        
          be a framework inplace to in essence force
        
        
          construction companies touse thatmaterial,
        
        
          whether it be by taxation, grand aidor other
        
        
          elements.
        
        
          
            SMALL TO LARGE SCALE
          
        
        
          Somemight think that the relatively small
        
        
          throughput ademolition contractormight
        
        
          expect in a recyclingoperationwhen
        
        
          compared to virgin aggregateproduction
        
        
          mightmake it not cost-effective to employ a
        
        
          washplant. IainWalker certainlybelieves that
        
        
          this is not the case.He told
        
        
          D&Ri
        
        
          that: “The
        
        
          systems are scaled. Iwould say thatwehave
        
        
          everything from40 tonnes per hour upwards
        
        
          anddependingon the typeofmaterial,
        
        
          that is not necessarilyhigh volume. So for
        
        
          demolitionwaste applications, itwouldgo
        
        
          through that veryquickly. Wehave found
        
        
          that the recyclingmarket inFrance tends to
        
        
          be for smaller volumes and capacities, in the
        
        
          40 tonneper hour range, soourAggwash
        
        
          machine, which is a logwash integrated
        
        
          with screening and recycling is a really good
        
        
          solutionbecause it’s a single chassis but quite
        
        
          a smallmachine, so there is amarket sector
        
        
          comingup for that.”
        
        
          Hewent on: “In theUK, the recyclingof
        
        
          demolitionwaste ismore established andwe
        
        
          find that typical applications aremore in the
        
        
          70 to120 tonnes per hour range, and that is
        
        
          reasonably typical of someotherEuropean
        
        
          markets. And even further afield, I’vebeen
        
        
          involvedwith enquiries from countries such
        
        
          asEgypt andotherMiddleEast states, and
        
        
          thesehave averaged100 tonnes per hour. The
        
        
          types of systemweoffer are appropriate for
        
        
          these volumes.”
        
        
          He continued: “If you take the larger
        
        
          ‘depot’ approach [transfer station] to
        
        
          recycling, you can install larger plant in a
        
        
          fixed installation. The interestingpoint to
        
        
          this, and especially in theUK, is thatwith
        
        
          landfill costs growing year on year, it is now
        
        
          commercially viable to considermaking the
        
        
          necessary investment in largerwashplant.”
        
        
          In fact TWSdoes havemachines in it is
        
        
          range that specifically tuned to the recycling
        
        
          role. Iain said: “We bundle construction,
        
        
          demolition and excavationwaste together
        
        
          whenwe talk about our systems because each
        
        
          of thesematerials is highly variable soour
        
        
          systems have tobe able to copewith this. In
        
        
          our process, we arehandlingmaterial of 100
        
        
          mm (4 inch) down andbasicallywhat our
        
        
          
            higher level
          
        
        
          with the largermaterial retained as a ‘good
        
        
          enough’ low valueproduct. The rejected
        
        
          material is getting increasingly expensive to
        
        
          dispensewithplus there is ademand for it
        
        
          providing it is of sufficient quality.”
        
        
          “If you take thewashing approach, you can
        
        
          remove thepaper, plastic andwood, you can
        
        
          remove the clays, so theproduct youhave at
        
        
          the endof theprocess ismuch,muchhigher
        
        
          quality so it fetches abetter price. In addition,
        
        
          you arenot throwing the -20mmor -10
        
        
          away, you are capturing that as an additional
        
        
          product. Iwould estimate that 40% less of the
        
        
          feedmaterial goes to landfill at the endof the
        
        
          washingprocess, which is ahuge cost saving.
        
        
          Theother 60% is the aggregate thatwould
        
        
          havebeenproduced anyway, but it is ofmuch
        
        
          higher quality andhence of greater value.”
        
        
          He continued: “Oneof thebarriers to the
        
        
          useof recycled aggregate is that often there
        
        
          is not a joinedup approach. Agovernment
        
        
          maywant to see a lot of recyclingbut theydo
        
        
          not do enough to incentivise it or themarket
        
        
          is not ready touse recycledmaterials. As an
        
        
          example, inQatar theywanted to recycle
        
        
          waste, the government found a company
        
        
          to take on a contract todo it, but in the
        
        
          end the contractor found that the country’s
        
        
          building standards said that you couldnot use
        
        
          recycledmaterial innew construction so it
        
        
          was impossible for him to sell thematerial he
        
        
          
            The first stage in the aggregatewashing process –
          
        
        
          
            pre-screening the feedmaterial to remove fines
          
        
        
          
            Metal in the feedmaterial can be removed by an overbandmagnet, just aswithmobile crushers and screens